Challenges to Implementing Healthcare Analytics

Challenges to Implementing Healthcare Analytics

Category : Healthcare Leadership

Share this Post:

Executive Summary

During a workshop at the Healthcare Analytics Symposium held in Chicago in July, a study was conducted by the Healthcare Center of Excellence ( to determine what the participants perceived were the top challenges they faced in implementing analytics at their healthcare organization. The participants included people from all levels of healthcare organizations from locations across the country. Each participant was asked to identify up to 5 challenges they faced in implementing healthcare analytics. They were also asked to then work in a group and develop 3 solutions to overcome the top challenges they identified. While the challenges facing healthcare analytics implementation may not surprise anyone, the ranking of the challenges might receive some unexpected attention.

Methodology & Results

In the analysis phase, the challenges were classified into 10 categories for further examination. Those categories were:

analytics tools   |    change management   |   costs   |   data management   |   education  |  integration   |   leadership   |   process   |   talent   |   technology

The top 3 categories were leadership (29%), data management (18%) and talent (14%). 

 Leadership included common terms/phrases such as “lack of priority”, “lack of vision”, “need for buy-in from staff” and “lack of direction”, but also included “disparate EHR systems”, “siloed systems” and “teams not working together”. These issues can all be resolved through proper leadership. Data management included “lack of data standardization”, “lack of data stewardship”, “lack of definition of key variables to study”, “where does the data reside” and “quality of data”. Talent included “lack of adequate analytics talent”, “hiring the right people”, “lack of skills”, “not enough qualified staff” and “retaining talent”.

Overall, the distribution of responses was decided pointed at leadership.

Even more surprising was the source of these comments. As part of the study, the participants were asked to include their title on the survey form they turned in. The titles were summarized into general categories which indicated the responses included all levels of the healthcare organization, from C-Level to the Analyst. 

The titles were matched back to the individual challenges to determine if there was any disparity between responses based on organization level. The levels were further summarized by span of control. Those with a wide span of control included positions director level and above. All of the others were included in the narrow span of control group. The prevailing thought would be that the participants in the lower levels or narrower span of control, would point to the leaders more often than other leaders. In actuality, of the total challenges categorized under leadership, the wide span participants pointed to leadership issues (27%) almost as much as the narrow span participants (31%). In fact, several of their comments were the ones pointed most directly at leadership such as, “no champion”, “unclear direction” and “executive leadership doesn’t have clear understanding of needs”. The lack of difference between the job types identifying leadership as a major challenge could also point to those in leadership positions not fully recognizing some of the areas they impact. 
The only challenges where the disparities were significant were in integration and processes. This is likely because of perspective. The wide span executives are anxious to see results of their investments through data integration versus the narrow span personnel desire for more and better processes to make their jobs easier.

Finally, as previously mentioned, the participants were asked to develop solutions for their greatest challenges as a group. Although leadership at 54% was the top solution by a wide margin, the order of the other solution categories changed substantially with talent at 22% moving to the second spot and process at 10% moving to the third spot. Data came in fourth at 9%. 


Although the results weren’t surprising, the strength of the argument for better executive leadership skills in healthcare was. Many outside of physical healthcare organizations can see the problem and when you talk to people inside the organizations, they wholeheartedly agree. It’s like the 800-pound gorilla that no one really wants to talk about, but as soon as it’s mentioned everyone starts nodding in agreement.

word cloud

This is by no way meant to disparage current healthcare leaders. They have been dealt a tough hand. No other industry has been asked to make such dramatic changes in such a short period of time. It’s like asking a major electronics retailer to also become a fine French restaurant within 12 months. In less than a decade they’ve had to convert to electronic records, change their revenue model (requiring new analytical functions in the process), prepare for a new coding scheme and lead a constituency that can be resistant to change. Most healthcare executives were not trained to handle such huge business issues. The good news is that leadership can be learned. It won’t happen overnight, but it needs to start right now if success is the desired outcome.

Professor J. Bryan Bennett
Executive Director
Healthcare Center of Excellence

Log out of this account

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.